Author Archive

Photo of the Week from Rob Katz, Portfolio Associate

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Installing GEWP Lines

Here at Acumen Fund, we often refer to the direct social impact of our investments: number of bednets soldhealthy babies deliveredseeds sownmicrofinance loans disbursed, etc.  But there are secondary impacts to Acumen’s investments, too – most notably, employment.

I snapped this photo of a young man, whose name I didn’t catch, taking a quick break at the end of a long day installing a Global Easy Water Products drip irrigation system.  I visited the farm, a 4-hour drive outside Aurangabad, last May, as the thermometer topped 45 degrees Celsius.  Despite the heat, farmers like Ramakrishnan Mahajan must quickly sow their fields and set up their irrigation systems during a short cotton-planting window – which is why he asked his GEWP sales rep to hire a group of six local farmboys to lend a hand.  Each of the boys – including the one pictured here – earned 200 rupees per day over 2 days of work.  For those keeping track at home, that’s about USD $4.50 per worker, per day.

Since 2003, Global Easy Water Products reports that its customers have paid for more than 410,000 man-hours of installation labor.  At rates similar to what Mr. Mahajan paid his crew, that’s more than USD $225,000 of employment income being plowed back into the local economies of Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.

Now if only this worker had a bottle of clean, fresh WaterHealth International branded Dr. Water to cool him down after the work was done…but that’s the subject of another photo for another day.

Rob Katz is a Portfolio Associate at Acumen and co-founder of NextBillion.net.

The Photo of the Week series features images chosen by Acumen Fund staff and community members — favorite photos they’ve taken in the field or pulled from the archive. Look for it every Tuesday.

Will Surekha Dial 1298 for Ambulance?

Monday, May 4th, 2009

A tiny bead of sweat ran down the ridge of my nose.  It reached the end, teetered for a split second, then dropped quietly onto the doctor’s desk.  I sat behind the desk, inside the Vijay Nagar Women of India clinic, which is tucked into a government-built housing project in the Bandra East area of Mumbai.  As the sweat hit the desk, it made a soft splat, and little Natra’s eyes followed it down.  About 3 years old, he seemed pretty interested in the inability of this strange white man to deal with the Mumbai heat – not surprising, all things considered.

Natra and his mother, Surekha, had agreed to take a survey about healthcare administered by Acumen Fund Fellow Joanna Harries and her colleague, Rubina Dsouza.  Joanna and Rubina work for Dial 1298 for Ambulance, a professionally-run, high quality ambulance service run in Mumbai (51 ambulances) and Kerala (30 ambulances). You dial 1298 to get a fully-equipped ambulance with doctor and medical equipment on-board.  1298 is affiliated with the Ambulance Access for All Foundation, whose mission is to provide high-quality service for all Indians, regardless of income. 

But will poor Indians call an ambulance?  That’s what Joanna and Rubina are working to find out.  Service for all is not only a noble goal, it’s good business as well – after all, some 40 to 60 percent of Mumbaikers live below the poverty line, in slums.  If you fail to serve this customer segment, you miss a huge number of calls – and your ambulances can run below capacity.

Effectively serving this market begins with listening, and that’s what Joanna and Rubina are doing.  They have been spending time visiting various Women of India clinics, all of which are located in slum areas, and asking a simple, 5-question survey: what do you do when you get sick?; how do you get to the hospital?; which (if any) ambulances do you call?; why wouldn’t you call an ambulance?; who helps you when you get sick?

Joanna and Rubina and I did eight surveys today, just the tip of the iceberg.  What is interesting is that 1298 takes its commitment to the low-income segments seriously – both in terms of social impact and in terms of business sense.  The company is marketing in a number of innovative ways – tying up with schools, hospitals, train stations, and more.  Slum outreach is an element of their business plan.  Regardless of income level, growing 1298’s customer base is an awareness game – call it marketing, brand management, outreach, whatever – you have to have potential customers know about your service before you earn their business.

Sankalp Forum: Social Enterprise Reigns in India

Friday, May 1st, 2009

The social enterprise space is alive and well in India.  This is my overarching conclusion having spent all day Tuesday at the inaugural Sankalp Forum, hosted by Intellecap in Mumbai.

Sankalp – which means “pledge” or “determination” in English – focused on the role of business in driving social change.  When I arrived on Tuesday morning, the main plenary hall was packed with attendees from across the social sector – entrepreneurs, investors, business executives, media, think-tanks, non-profits and students.  It was heartening to see such a diverse crowd.

The first plenary panel was among the best of the day.  It featured three investors, a journalist and a consultant.  I’m sure there’s a joke somewhere that begins with such a cast of characters!  Vineet Rai, of Aavishkaar – a BoP investment fund – suggested that C.K. Prahalad’s 2004 arguments have evolved, and that selling shampoo isn’t social enterprise.  (You won’t find much disagreement here.)

Unlike other Prahalad critics, however, Rai offered his “Four S’s of Social Enterprise” in retort: Social, Small, Sustainable, Scale.  Whether he intended it to or not, this 4-S framework persisted throughout the day – especially in the investment panels.

Investment panels?  Sankalp was not a typical conference – it was also a social enterprise investment forum.  The event was home to the final round of judging, identifying 15 high-impact enterprises serving social ends through market-based means from a field of 300 nominees.  Some of the interesting enterprises I saw at Sankalp include – in no particular order:

Ziqitza Education: (Editor’s note: Updated the link; this is direct to the right site. Thanks Abhishek for pointing that out!) Also known as “Education Access for All”, Ziqitza Education is a young social enterprise operating private schools and e-learning tools in Rajasthan, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.  Can there be chain private schools?  In India, where the demand for good private education is universal, the answer is probably yes.  (Parents of all but the poorest kids are willing to pay school fees, research shows.  Education spending is the first priority after food and shelter…)  If you are looking for a new company to keep your eye on, Ziqitza Education might be a good place to start.

Vaatsalya Healthcare: Vaatsalya won the Sankalp High Growth Award in the Healthcare category.  It’s a corporate hospital operating in semi-urban and rural areas – a first for India.  With a strong presence in Karnataka and coming expansion to Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra, Vaatsalya is another company worth tracking.

Gramin Suvidha Kendra: This is a partnership between the Multi Commodities Exchange and India Post to use postmen – ubiquitous across India – to bring price information to rural farmers.  It’s allowing farmers to access futures contracts for the first time, which allows for cash flow smoothing.  For all the talk of microfinance, the kind of work GSK is doing is really the bricks and mortar of a functioning agricultural supply chain – which could do more to alleviate poverty than many of these other, more complex, companies.

D.Light Design: A social enterprise that sells solar-powered LED lights in East Africa and India, D.Light works to eradicate kerosene lamps from the world.  These lamps are inefficient, costly and terrible for your health.  A D.Light lamp – they have a range of brands – gets at all three of these problems.  (Full disclosure: Acumen Fund is an investor in D.Light.)

There were dozens of entrepreneurs at the event, all of them with inspiring business plans in various stages of development and implementation.  I hope the investors present left with pockets full of business cards and plenty of new ideas about the viability of the social sector here in India. I was also thrilled to see my colleague Vikram Raman on stage to present the awards for healthcare. Vikram was the lead judge in that vertical at Sankalp, a real testimony to his deep knowledge of the social enterprise space and of healthcare in particular.

In many ways, Sankalp reminded me of the 2004 Eradicating Poverty Through Profit conference, which was arguably the first significant event ever to focus exclusively on the intersection between development and enterprise.  (I should know – I helped plan the 2004 event as a World Resources Institute employee.)  As in 2004, there was a palpable buzz among participants Tuesday – that finally, there was critical mass around the idea of using business to do good.  As in 2004, however, there were also too many panels and not enough networking time.  And there was a nagging feeling that it might be a little inappropriate to run a conference about alleviating poverty and environmental problems in a 5-star hotel with the air conditioning set at a chilly 68 degrees Farenheit.  You heard the same criticisms of the 2004 event, held at a high-rise San Francisco hotel.

I should restrain my criticism, however – Sankalp was a great event.  Personally, I was glad to see colleagues from India, Asia and as far away as the United States during the tea breaks.  Despite all the talk of recession – or perhaps because of it – the social enterprise space is alive and well. 

Yet there is much to do.  Antony Bugg-Levine, of the Rockefeller Foundation, suggested in the closing plenary that we must be afraid of the hype.  Social enterprise might be alive and well, but it has not arrived, at least not yet.  Let’s remember that it took 30 years – and substantial subsidy – to get the microfinance sector fully developed.  Impact investing – and BoP business strategy – can be done quicker and better by learning from microfinance, but it won’t be an overnight change.

Whatever happened to the other 690?

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Update: You can now download and listen to the call in its entirety:

Acumen Fund Summer Associate call – April 1, 2009

For the 10 summer internship positions Acumen Fund has open globally, we received 700 applications from an amazing group of candidates. We’re going to do our best to find the 10 people who are the best fit for our needs this summer, but the bigger, harder question is, “What about the other 690?”

Sasha posed this question a few weeks ago on his blog and on the Acumen Fund blog. There were some comments; there was also a discussion here at Acumen about how best to engage this “amazing group of candidates.” After a couple of e-mails and meetings, we decided to run an experiment: offer our 690 non-accepted candidates a private conference call briefing from senior Acumen staff. This was a way to say thanks, to welcome folks into our community, and to offer ways to stay engaged – not just with Acumen Fund, but with the social enterprise space as a whole.

The call was yesterday morning; about 10% of the invited candidates joined (67 total). I helped moderate; Brian Trelstad and Yasmina Zaidman talked about the latest Acumen happenings (describing some of the newer investments, our plans for 2009 and 2010, etc.) We actually recorded the whole call, and will release a .mp3 version of it as soon as we get a copy and have a chance to convert it. (For some reason, Global Crossing records conference calls in .wav format – not helpful.)

Acumen Fund Summer Associate call – April 1, 2009

After a short presentation, Brian and Yasmina took questions – and the floodgates opened up. I promised at the end of the call to post questions to our blog, so here they are. We – Brian, Yasmina, me and the rest of the team – will do our best to answer them over the next few weeks. In the meantime, take a look – and comment below if one question in particular is of interest!

————————————————————————————————–

1. How do social metrics figure into an ROI calculation? What are the typical returns on investment and investment timeframes you look for in assessing viability of projects?

2. One of the biggest challenges is identifying entrepreneurs in low-income communities. What is the methodology that Acumen follows to identify these entrepreneurs? Furthermore, how does Acumen Fund provide the technical assistance to ensure that these enterprises are indeed successful?

3. Has Acumen Fund encountered challenges in the more political unstable regions it operates in? If so, how has or is it working through them?

4. What is the evaluation process for the ventures you look at for investing? Do you use some kind of a Social Return On Investment metric? Or what metrics do you use?

5. What percent of your annual investments (in 2007?) were considered failures? Were they considered failures because of inability to repay or lack of social impact? How has this number changed since Acumen was founded?

6. Could you talk a little bit about the work of a Summer Associate an Acumen? In other words, what would a typical day at work look like?

7. What are the next steps if we are interested in working with Acumen Fund, and we are not considered for this year’s summer internship program?

8. Many of my peers are excited about careers in the social venture sector but struggle to see what the long term career path might be given the maturity of the sector. Could you help chart out the possibilities for a post-MBA graduate?

9. What is Acumen doing to increase awareness of their services to people in the developing countries?

10. How did Acumen Fund start, and does the opportunity exist (in your opinion) for an individual to start an analogous Fund working in other geographical locations? If so, what skills would you suggest an entrepreneur develop to follow this path?

11. How important is it for clients to have the potential to receive additional loans from Acumen in the future? Have any clients already received repeat loans? Do you think the potential has a strong influence on an entrepreneur’s motivation to repay?

12. Could you comment on non-profit/philanthropic and profit-driven/sustainable funding models?

13. I’m curious with regards to the diversification of investment strategies adopted. For example: if investment is being done in the housing sector of Pakistan do you invest in multiple arenas or are your investments confined to a specific focus area?

14. How does Acumen Fund take investment decisions or evaluate ROI in an environment where there is no financial data?

15. Could you elaborate on your thoughts with regard to involvement in social investing earlier in one’s career versus later in one’s career? Would getting involved later in one’s career have a greater impact and perhaps be more worthwhile?

16. Could you talk about your own professional paths and how you made the shift from more traditional careers to management roles in the BoP/ social entrepreneurship space?

17. Is something specific that Acumen looks for in a candidate profile?

18. Could you talk a little about entry level positions at Acumen Fund for recent MBA and policy graduates?

19. Could you comment more on how to get involved with Acumen Fund’s work outside the fellows and interns program — perhaps more detail on the “young professional” network?

20. What do you suggest an individual who has little experience in international work can do to participate with Acumen?

21. Where does Acumen Fund see itself in the future in its investments in ecomarkets? Is Acumen Fund aware of any viable engagements in payment for environmental services in the water sector, not only in water delivery but resource conservation (e.g., in watersheds/parks/reserve systems)?

22. Given the culture of intellectual property protection in the market and the simultaneous high purchasing value of knowledge (such as journal subscriptions), which can be an access barrier for “the base of the pyramid,” how does Acumen Fund address such issues head on to promote and extend its knowledge sharing impact? Particularly, how does Acumen Fund convince its partners (if they are entrepreneurs in a highly competitive marketplace) to be more open in sharing their knowledge?

23. What is the Acumen Fund’s position on the role of public-private partnerships both in the areas of environmental markets and knowledge sharing?

Reminder: Summer Student Leaders Workshop – Apply by April 10

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

This May, Acumen Fund will host its first Summer Student Leaders Workshop. Be sure to get your application in before the April 10 deadline!

More information can be found on Aden Van Noppen’s blog post or on the Acumen Fund web site.

Thanks for your interest, good luck with the mini projects and we look forward to reviewing your applications!